Tuesday, August 28, 2012

A Crowded Dedication



When a site on the internet receives so many hits in a relativity short time , the site is said to have gone “viral.” I guess this could sum up the number of viewers for which temple dedication? (If I’ve confused you, I’m asking which temple dedication has had the most viewers to date?)

 

A)     Monticello, Utah

B)     Winter Quarters, Nebraska

C)     Palmyra, New York

D)     Anchorage, Alaska

 

Yesterday’s answer:

(C)   Parley P. Pratt, Ziba Petersen, Oliver Cowdery, Peter Whitmer Jr.

 

The following from Parley P. Pratt: Elders Cowdery, Whitmer, Peterson, myself, and F. G. Williams, who accompanied us from Kirtland, now assembled in Independence, Jackson County, Missouri, and came to the conclusion that one of our number had better return to the church in Ohio, and perhaps to headquarters in New York, in order to communicate with the Presidency, report ourselves, pay a visit to the numerous churches we had organized on our outward journey, and also to procure more books.

   For this laborious enterprise I was selected by the voice of my four brethren. I accordingly took leave of them, and of our friends in that country, and started on foot.

   In nine days I arrived at St. Louis, distance three hundred miles. It was now the latter part of February; the snow had disappeared, the rivers were breaking up, and the whole country inundated as it were with mud and water. I spent a few days with a friend in the country, at the same place we had tarried in the way out; and then took a steamer in St. Louis bound for Cincinnati, where I landed in safety after a passage of one week. From Cincinnati I travelled on foot to Strongville, Ohio, forty miles from Kirtland.

   This last walk consisted of some two hundred and fifty miles, over very bad, muddy road; and for some days I had found myself much fatigued, and quite out of health. Hearing of some brethren in Strongville. I determined to inquire them out, and try their hospitality to a sick and weary stranger without making myself known.

   I accordingly approached the house of an old gentleman by the name of Coltrin, about sundown, and inquired if they could entertain a weary stranger who had no money. The old gentleman cast his eyes upon me, and beheld a weary, weather-beaten traveler; soiled with the toil of a long journey; besmeared with mud, eyes inflamed with pain, long beard, and a visage lengthened by sickness and extreme fatigue. After a moment’s hesitation he bade me welcome, and invited me into his house. Several ladies were at tea. I addressed them as a stranger who had come to partake of their hospitality for the night.

   They received me with a smile of welcome, and immediately insisted on my sitting down to tea, during which something like the following conversation took place:

   “Stranger, where are you from? You certainly look weary; you must have travelled a long distance!”

   “Yes; I am from beyond the frontiers of Missouri; a distance of twelve hundred miles.”

   “Ah, indeed! Did you hear anything of the four great prophets out that way?”

   “Prophets! What prophets?”

   “Why, four men—strange men—who came through this country and preached, and baptized hundreds of people; and, after ordaining Elders and organizing churches, they continued on westward, as we suppose, to the frontiers on a mission to the Indians; and we have never heard from them since. But the great work commenced by them still rolls on. It commenced last fall in Kirtland, and has spread for a hundred miles around; thousands have embraced it, and among others ourselves and many in the neighborhood.”

   “But what did they preach? And why do you call them prophets?”

   “Why they opened the Scriptures in a wonderful manner; showed the people plainly of may things to come; opened the doctrine of Christ, as we never understood it before; and, among other things, they introduced a very extraordinary Book, which, they said, was an ancient record of the forefathers of the Indian tribes.”

   “How were they dressed, and in what style did they travel?”

   “They were dressed plainly and comely, very neat in their persons, and each one wore a hat of a drab color, low round crown and broad brim, after the manner of the Shakers, so it is said; for we had not the privilege of seeing them ourselves.

   “However, these fashioned hats were not a peculiarity of this people; but were given to each of them by the Shakers, at the time they passed through this country; so they wore them. As to their style of travelling, they sometimes go on foot, sometimes in a carriage, and sometimes, perhaps, by water; but they provide themselves with neither purse nor scrip for their journey, neither shoes nor two coats apiece.”

   “Well, from your description of these four men I think I have seen them on the frontiers of Missouri. They had commenced a mission in the Indian territory; but were compelled by the United States agents, influenced, no doubt, by missionaries, to depart from the Indian country, although well received by the Indians themselves.”

   “You saw them, then?”

   “I did.”

   “Were they well?”

   “I believe they were all in good health and spirits.”

   “Will they return soon? O, who would not give the world to see them!”

   “Well, I am one of them, and the others you may, perhaps, see.”

   “You one of them! God bless you. What is your name?”

   “My name is Parley P. Pratt, one of the four men you have described, but not much of a prophet; and as to a sight of me in my present plight, I think it would not be worth half a world.”

   The rest of the conversation I cannot write, for all spoke, all laughed, and all rejoiced at once.

Autobiography of Parley P. Pratt, pg. 66-69.


 

Monday, August 27, 2012

“Have you heard of the four Prophets?”



Who are the four Prophets?

A)     The Three Nephites plus John the Revelator

B)     Moses, Isaiah, Jeremiah, Ezekiel

C)     Parley P. Pratt, Ziba Petersen, Oliver Cowdery, Peter Whitmer Jr.

D)     Joseph Smith, Joseph F. Smith, George Albert Smith, Joseph Fielding Smith

Yesterday’s answers:

1.      (A)   The most important non-Mormon city

 

. . . in St. Louis, a location that historian Stanley Kimball dubbed as “the most important non-Mormon city in Church history,” knowledge of the Church came readily to hand. For example, newspapers in St. Louis often detailed the conflict between Mormons and Missourians. Some Latter-day Saints appear to have sought employment and safety in St. Louis after an October 1838 executive order from the governor demanded that they leave Missouri. Many residents of St. Louis expressed sympathy and support for the Mormon exiles. Dissident Mormons also found a safe haven in St. Louis. Later, the burgeoning city served as an “emigrant center” for those migrating west.

 

Frederick S. Buchanan, “The Ebb and Flow of Mormonism in Scotland,” BYU Studies 27, no. 2 (1978): 28.

 

2.      (B)   1854

 

It was announced at the April 8, 1854, general conference “that St. Louis was to be organized into a Stake of Zion.” Erastus Snow reported that upon hearing this “some smiled and some laughed outright, and some as guileless as Phillip, said, can any good come out of Saint Louis?” Many Latter-day Saint at the time believed St. Louis to be “a sinkhole of corruption and iniquity.” They saw troubles ahead for latter-day Saints who remained in that city. In contrast, Church leaders saw great value in St. Louis as a gathering place for the Saints.

 

Susan Easton Black, St. Louis Luminary: The Latter-day Saint Experience at the Mississippi River, 1854-1855, BYU Studies, 49:4, 158.

 

3.      (C)   The LDS are more respected

 

[Erastus] Snow found St. Louis to be a haven, a respite for Latter-day Saints. He wrote:

St. Louis is a fine, large, and flourishing city, and has furnished employment to many hundreds and thousands of our brethren, who have here in a short time made a good outfit for the gathering places of the Saints. This city has been an asylum for our people from fifteen to twenty years. There are few public buildings of any consideration in this city that our brethren have no taken an active and prominent part in erecting and ornamenting. There are few factories, foundries, or mercantile establishments, but they have taken, or are taking an active part in establishing or sustaining, either as employers, as artisans, or as customer. . . . There is probably no city in the world where the Latter-day Saints are more respected, and where they may sooner obtain an outfit for Utah than in this city.

 

Susan Easton Black, St. Louis Luminary: The Latter-day Saint Experience at the Mississippi River, 1854-1855, BYU Studies, 49:4, 159.

 

4.      (B)   2 

 

Better attendance at the second conference was reported [April 6, 1855]. “Erastus Snow was sustained as President of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints in the Western States,” and Milo Andrus was sustained as president of the St. Louis Stake of Zion, along with other local leaders.

 

Susan Easton Black, St. Louis Luminary: The Latter-day Saint Experience at the Mississippi River, 1854-1855, BYU Studies, 49:4, 168.

 

5.      (B)   6 wards

 

It should be noted that six wards were organized in St. Louis and nine branches in Missouri, Iowa, and Illinois. At the time, there were 788 members residing in the six St. Louis wards, the largest number being in the St. Louis Sixth Ward. There were 532 members residing in the nine branches.

Susan Easton Black, St. Louis Luminary: The Latter-day Saint Experience at the Mississippi River, 1854-1855, BYU Studies, 49:4, 176.

Sunday, August 26, 2012

Sunday Tidbits- St. Louis






1.      Historian Stanley Kimball dubbed St. Louis as being what?



A)     The most important non-Mormon city

B)     The most unsafe city for a Mormon

C)     The Salt Lake City of the Midwest

D)     Heaven



2.      When was a Stake first announced for St. Louis?



A)     1838

B)     1854

C)     1901

D)     1959



3.      Erastus Snow said that the Saints in St. Louis have more of this than any other city in the world. What is it?



A)     Money

B)     Persecution

C)     Respect

D)     Understanding of gospel principles



4.       In 1855, how many presidents of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints were there?



A)     1

B)     2

C)     3

D)     5



5.      How many wards were created in St. Louis in the mid 1850’s?

A)     None, there was only enough for a branch

B)     6

C)     1

D)     4



Yesterday’s answer:



(D) High Priest and Seventies

On March 23, 1942, the First Presidency announced that for the duration of World War II only older men who had been ordained high priests and seventies would be called on full-time missions.



Dew, Sheri L., Go Forward With Faith (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book Company, 1996), 126.



Additional interesting information:

During World War II, in Salt Lake City the First Presidency closely monitored the mounting crisis and soon ordered the evacuation of all missionaries from Europe. Most missionaries crossed the Atlantic Ocean on cargo ships

with makeshift accommodations for several hundred passengers each. Typically, these ship’s holds were filled with bunks, with only a curtain separating the men’s and women’s areas. President J. Reuben Clark, Jr., regarded the successful evacuation of missionaries as truly miraculous:

   “The entire group was evacuated from Europe in three months, at a time when tens of thousands of Americans were besieging the ticket offices of the great steamship companies for passage, and the Elders had no reservations. Every time a group was ready to embark there was available the necessary space, even though efforts to reserve space a few hours before had failed. . . .

   “Truly the blessings of the Lord attended this great enterprise.”

In Conference Report, April 1940, pg. 20.

Saturday, August 25, 2012

Heavens Protecting Hand






Who was called on to serve full-time missions during World War II?



A)                 Nineteen-year old elders

B)                 Relief Society sisters with no obligations at home

C)                 Teachers and Priests

D)                 High Priests and Seventies



Yesterday’s answer:



(A)   $40,000 worth of pioneer genealogy



I remember the story that President George Albert Smith used to tell us. Now, as you remember Brother Smith, he was one of the friendliest men that I think we ever had in the Church. No one was a stranger to him. He’d get on a plane and within five minutes the man in the seat next to him was like an old friend. When he arrived in Chicago during the Chicago World’s Fair he learned that the president of the fair was a man by the name of Dawes. He had been to Harvard University with a man named Dawes. He wondered if this could be his old class mate. So, prompted by this spirit of friendliness, he called up the office and asked the secretary if he could have an appointment to see Mr. Dawes.

   There were three brothers-Charles Dawes who was the vice-president of the United States, you will recall; Henry Dawes; and Rufus Dawes. Now, he wasn’t sure of the first name of his friend, and this smart young secretary said,

“Well, there are 125 people lined up outside to see him, but I guess if you want to come and stand in line you can see him.” “Well,” said President Smith, “I didn’t want anything; I’m just an old schoolmate and just wanted to pass the time of day.” “Well,” she said, “wait a minute. I think he’d want to meet somebody who doesn’t want anything. All the rest of these people want something. You come around to the side door and I’ll let you in to see him.” So, President Smith caught a taxi and went out there.

   Just as he got to the side door, as indicated, this man was ushering out a couple who had been in conference with him. One look told him this wasn’t the man he knew. Now, here he was ushered into the busy man’s office without a thing to say to him. He rubbed his hands a little bit and finally said, “Mr. Dawes, where do your people come from?” President Smith said, “Wasn’t that an asinine thing to ask him.” Mr. Dawes looked at him for a minute and asked, “Are you interested in genealogy?”

   Well, here was President Smith’s cue. He told him about the genealogical library, our great interest in genealogical research. Mr. Dawes said, “Let me show you something.” He went into the back room and came out with a volume, a beautifully bound volume, and said, “This is the genealogy of my mother.  I loved my mother and I was curious about her ancestors. So I had researchers go over to the old country and search out her genealogy. It cost me somewhere between $30,000 to $40,000 to make this research. And now that I have it done and have satisfied my curiosity I have no further use for it. How would you like it if I gave it to you to take back and put in your wonderful library?”

   “My,” President Smith said, “I think that would be a treasure.”

   This was the genealogy of the Gates family-one of our pioneer families. And that genealogy linked with many of the pioneer families. Within 15 minutes President Smith walked out of this man’s office, within his arms $40,000 worth of research from a man he had never seen before. You tell me the Lord isn’t opening the doors to genealogy work? It means merely that when you do all that you can, then you can expect the Lord to open the doors beyond our own efforts.



Genealogical Devotion Addresses--1970, Fifth Annual Priesthood Genealogical Research Seminar, Brigham Young University, 1970, pg. 31-32.


Friday, August 24, 2012

The Chicago World’s Fair Offering






Elder George Albert Smith visited the Chicago’s World Fair. While there he met with Mr. Dawes, the president of the fair. What was Elder Smith given by this man?



A)                 $40,000 worth of pioneer genealogy

B)                 A discount ticket to the fair

C)                 A promise of a better location for the Mormon pavilion at the next World’s Fair

D)                 An invitation for the Mormon Tabernacle Choir to sing at the fair.



Yesterday’s answer:

(C)  A vision similar to Joseph Smith’s first vision



The following is related by Harrison Burgess

     On the third Sabbath in May while speaking to a congregation I declared that I knew that the Book of Mormon and the work of God were true. The next day while laboring in the field something seemed to whisper to me, “Do you know the book [Book] of Mormon is true?” My mind became perplexed and darkened, and I was so tormented in spirit that I left my work and retired into the woods. The misery and distress that I there experienced cannot be described. The tempter all the while seemed to say, “Do you know that the Book of Mormon is true?”

     I remained in this situation about two hours. Finally I resolved to know, by exercising faith similar to that which the Brother of Jared possessed, whether I had proclaimed the truth or not, and commenced praying to the God of Heaven for a testimony of these things. Suddenly a glorious personage clothed in white stood before me and exhibited to my view the plates from which the Book of Mormon was taken.

Harrison Burgess, “Labor in the Vineyard,” Twelfth Book of the Faith Promoting Series, p. 65-6.


Thursday, August 23, 2012

He Couldn’t Deny It






What experience did early member of the Church, Harrison Burgess claim to have?

A)                 An out of body experience

B)                 A visitation from the Angel Moroni

C)                 A vision similar to Joseph Smith’s first vision

D)                 Seeing the Three Nephites



Yesterday’s answer:



(B) Items left behind by those going to the California gold fields would be of more worth than gold.

 Brigham Young, in his wisdom, was convinced that the real “gold rush” was not in California, but rather by staying put in the Salt Lake Valley. This proved true when many of the individuals seeking a fortune in the gold fields were forced to dispose of their goods in Salt Lake City at discounted prices, or entirely abandon valuable tools, utensils, and equipment on the prairies to lighten their loads, thus reducing the travel time to California. John D. Lee spent several days looking for a suitable stove for his family. He finally “found one to his liking, a large Premium Range No. 3 which would have cost more than fifty dollars to purchase. On the way back he started loading up with powder and lead, cooking utensils, tobacco, nails, tools, bacon, coffee, sugar, trunks of clothing, axes, and harness.”

Juanita Brooks, John Doyle Lee: Zealot-Pioneer Builder-Scapegoat, new ed. (Glendale, Ca: Arthur H. Clark Co., 1972), 48-49.

Wednesday, August 22, 2012

The Real “Gold Rush”




Why did Brigham Young say the real “gold rush” would be in Utah?

A)     A ploy to disinterest the Saints from leaving Utah for the California gold fields

B)     What would be left behind by those traveling from the east to California would be more valuable than gold

C)     The angel Moroni appeared to him showing him the large gold fields of Utah

D)     He was referring to the gold statue angel Moroni that would one day be placed on top of the Salt Lake Temple

Yesterday’s answer:

(B)   1912

  . . . the First Presidency asked the General Relief Society in 1912 to create the “Temple and Burial Clothing Department” to be the principal ceremonial clothing outlet for Latter-day Saints.



Jill Mulvay Derr, Janath Russell Cannon, and Maureen Ursenbach Beecher, Women of Covenant: The Story of Relief Society (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book, 1992), 198.



Additional interesting information:



 Great care was taken to procure the finest possible materials for clothing the dead.



Seymour B. Young, Diary, July 27, 1921, typescript, Church History Library

Tuesday, August 21, 2012

The Original Church Distribution Center






What year did the Church set up the first Church “Distribution Center?”



A)     1847

B)     1912

C)     1955

D)     1970



Yesterday’s answer:



(D)   That the Church could settle in the State of Maine



One of the individuals that Brigham Young wrote to was Hugh J. Anderson, the Governor of the state of Maine, seeking asylum at the time the Saints were expecting expulsion from the state of Illinois. This was largely due to the fact that there had been very little persecution towards the Saints in this state.

Donald Q. Cannon, “Wilford Woodruffs Mission to the Fox Islands.” In New England. Edited by Donald Q. Cannon. Regional Studies in Latter-day Saint Church History series. (Provo, Utah: Brigham Young University, 1988), 85-99; Paul Edwards Damron, “The Narrative of the Saints in Maine from 1831 to the 1900’s.” Manuscript. LDS Church Archives, Salt Lake City.


Monday, August 20, 2012

The Maine Inquiry




As I sat at the dinner table in the Longfellow estate in Cambridge, Massachusetts, which served as the mission home to the Massachusetts Boston Mission, and while President Ballif was announcing the first assignments to the new group of elders that I was apart, I prayed that if it was the Lord’s will that I could serve outside the confines of Boston, at least in a area a little less hectic, it would be much appreciated. When the President read my name and announced that my first area would be Guilford, Maine, I was happy and whispered a silent thank-you. I had no idea where Guilford was, but all that matter was it sounded small and uncomplicated, and for this I was excited.

I enjoyed Maine. It’s unlike any of the other New England State both in its culture and landscape. For the short amount of time that I served in this state, I learned fast that it was brimming with good, down to earth folks.

   Wilford Woodruff discovered the same thing. He served in the Fox Islands and baptized numerous individuals. In fact, the Fox Islands were part of my first district (We had a huge district, in fact, my area took in 1/3 of the state. It sounds big, but trust me, there was very little population. I’m sure there were more moose than people).

   Maine was good to me, and has always been good to the Church. What did Brigham Young request from the Governor of the State?

A)     That he encourages people in the state to move to Nauvoo to start a new life

B)     That the Church be permitted to double its missionary force in the State

C)     That he trade Maine lobster for green Jello and Funeral potatoes.

D)     That the Church could settle in the state as its end destination, rather than the unknown confines of the west

Yesterday’s answer:

1.                  (B)  It was believed that Sidney Rigdon copied the transcript in 1829.



Before you read the story, think about this one. First off, Joseph Smith and Sidney Rigdon did not know each other in 1829, in fact Sidney Rigdon had not yet learned about the Church. That wouldn’t happen until December 1830. Finally, the Book of Mormon wasn’t released to the public until March 1830.


The following from David Whitmer:
It is recorded in the American Cyclopedia and the Encyclopedia Britannica, that I, David Whitmer, have denied my testimony as one of the three witnesses to the divinity of the Book of Mormon; and that the other two witnesses, Oliver Cowdery and Martin Harris, denied their testimony to that Book. I will say once more to all mankind, that I have never at any time denied that testimony or any part thereof. I also testify to the world, that neither Oliver Cowdery or Martin Harris ever at any time denied their testimony. They both died reaffirming the truth of the divine authenticity of the Book of Mormon. I was present at the death bed of Oliver Cowdery, and his last words were, “Brother David, be true to your testimony to the Book of Mormon.” He died here in Richmond, Mo., on March 3rd, 1850. Many witnesses yet live in Richmond, who will testify to the truth of these facts, as well as to the good character of Oliver Cowdery.

     The very powers of darkness have combined against the Book of Mormon, to prove that it is not the word of God, and this should go to prove to men of spiritual understanding, that the Book is true. . . .

     Besides other false statements that are in the two encyclopedias above mentioned is the old story of the Spaulding manuscript. That is, that one Solomon Spaulding who died in Amity, Penn., in 1816, had written a romance, the scene of which was among the ancient Indians who lived in this country. That Spaulding died before he published his romance, and that Sidney Rigdon got hold of the manuscript in a printing office and copied it; that subsequently the manuscript was returned to Solomon Spaulding; That thirteen years after the death of Spaulding, in 1829, Rigdon became associated with Joseph Smith, who read the Spaulding manuscript from behind a blanket to Oliver Cowdery, his amanuensis, who wrote it down. Hence the origin of the Book of Mormon. This is what I claimed by the enemies of the book: Satan had to concoct some plan to account for the origin of that book.

     I will say that all who desire to investigate the Spaulding manuscript story will not be obliged to go very far before they will see the entire falsity of that claim. I testify to the world that I am an eye-witness to the translation of the greater part of the Book of Mormon. Part of it was translated in my father’s house in Fayette, Seneca County, N.Y. . . .

     When the Spaulding story was made known to believers in the book, they called for the Spaulding manuscript, but it could not be found; but recently, thanks to the Lord, the original manuscript has been found and identified. It has been placed in the library of Oberlin college, Oberlin, Ohio, for public inspection. All who has doubts about it being the original Spaulding manuscript, can satisfy themselves by visiting Oberlin and examining the proofs.

     The manuscript is in the hands of those who are not believers in the Book of Mormon. They have kindly allowed the believers in the book to publish a copy of the manuscript, with the proofs that it is the manuscript of Solomon Spaulding. There is no similarity whatever between it and the Book of Mormon. Anyone who investigates this question will see that the Spaulding manuscript story is a fabrication concocted by the enemies of the Book of Mormon, in order to account for the origin of that book.

     Neither Joseph Smith, Oliver Cowdery, Martin Harris or myself ever met Sidney Rigdon until after the Book of Mormon was in print. I know this of my own personal knowledge, being with Joseph Smith, in Seneca County, N.Y., in the winter of 1830, when Sidney Rigdon and Edward Partridge came from Kirtland, Ohio, to see Joseph Smith, and where Rigdon and Partridge saw Joseph Smith for the first time in their lives.

     The Spaulding manuscript story is a myth; there being no direct testimony on record in regard to Rigdon’s connection with the manuscript of Solomon Spaulding.

Unpublished Revelations of the Prophets and Presidents of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints Vol. II (Salt Lake City, Utah: Collier’s Publishing Company, 1993), 124-26